D.V.D. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Deportation TRO, D. Mass. 2025)
Legal Issues
BrynoDC Coverage 2 videos
Overview
Overview
The government appealed Judge Murphy's temporary restraining order preventing the removal of immigrants to third countries without proper notice.
Overview
Noncitizens with final removal orders sued the Trump administration over the recent policy of deporting individuals to to a third country, specifically El Salvador, without first providing an opportunity for the contestation of removal.
Overview
The government appealed Judge Murphy's order granting a preliminary injunction which prevents the administration from deporting individuals to third countries without giving them a chance to contest that deportation due to fear of injury or death.
The Issue
Issue
Whether the Trump administration's policy of removing noncitizens with final removal orders to a third country without providing an opportunity to contest the removal violates due process rights and immigration statutes.
The Rules
Rule
Noncitizens with final removal orders retain constitutional due process protections and statutory rights to meaningful review of removal decisions; agency action must comply with the Administrative Procedure Act.
The Application
Analysis
Under the challenged policy, noncitizens were deported to El Salvador without opportunity to contest their removal, raising questions about compliance with both constitutional due process and statutory procedures governing removal orders.
The Conclusion
Conclusion
The court decided the case addressing whether the removal-to-third-country policy complies with constitutional and statutory protections for noncitizens with final removal orders.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support