Executive Order 14210

Implementing the President's "Department of Government Efficiency" Workforce Optimization Initiative

Signed 2025-02-11 in effect
Federal WorkforceDOGEGovernment ReformMass TerminationsSeparation of powers ↗
Federal WorkforceGovernment ReformEducation DOGEFiring/RIFLitigation

The operational order directing the mass termination of probationary federal employees and implementing DOGE-recommended workforce reductions across all agencies. This is the order that triggered the largest category of federal workforce litigation. Status: The administration has had remarkable success at the Supreme Court on workforce cases despite repeated lower-court findings of illegality.

Section by Section

What each section does, and how they differ.

Sec. 1 Purpose

Reform federal workforce for efficiency and productivity.

Sec. 2 Definitions

Defines agency, employee, DOGE Team Lead, temporary employee, and enforcement-related roles.

Sec. 3 Reforming the Federal Workforce

Agencies must implement 1-for-4 hiring ratio, get DOGE Team Lead input on career appointments, begin large-scale reductions in force, and propose organizational reforms.

Sec. 4 Exclusions

Order does not apply to military; agency heads may exempt positions for national security, homeland security, or public safety.

Sec. 5 General Provisions

Standard boilerplate: preserves existing agency authority, conditions the order on appropriations, and creates no enforceable private rights.

Linked Court Cases (7)

AFGE v. OPM 25-1677

***AFGE v. OPM***, No. 3:25-cv-01780 (N.D. Cal.) -- Reinstatement of approximately 16,000 terminated probationary employees. Judge Alsup ordered reinstatement; SCOTUS lifted the order on standing grounds.

AFGE v. Trump 25-4014

***AFGE v. Trump***, No. 3:25-cv-03698 (N.D. Cal.) -- Challenge to RIF plans across 22 agencies. Judge Illston blocked; SCOTUS lifted the injunction.

New York v. McMahon 1:25-cv-01080

***New York v. McMahon***, No. 1:25-cv-10601 (D. Mass.) -- Department of Education RIF. SCOTUS sided with the administration; Sotomayor dissent.

New York v. McMahon 1:25-cv-10601

registry eo_source_key backfill

AFGE v. OPM 25-1677

registry eo_source_key backfill

registry eo_source_key backfill

AFGE v. Trump 25-4014

registry eo_source_key backfill

Litigation Summary

***AFGE v. OPM***, No. 3:25-cv-01780 (N.D. Cal.) -- Reinstatement of approximately 16,000 terminated probationary employees. Judge Alsup ordered reinstatement; SCOTUS lifted the order on standing grounds.; ***AFGE v. Trump***, No. 3:25-cv-03698 (N.D. Cal.) -- Challenge to RIF plans across 22 agencies. Judge Illston blocked; SCOTUS lifted the injunction.; ***New York v. McMahon***, No. 1:25-cv-10601 (D. Mass.) -- Department of Education RIF. SCOTUS sided with the administration; Sotomayor dissent.; ***Jackson v. Kennedy***, No. 1:25-cv-01750 (D.D.C.) -- Class action by terminated HHS employees. Motion to dismiss denied Jan. 22, 2026.