← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

No. 25-1512 Circuit · Decided First Amendment
District
📄 Read the Opinion
Court
4th Cir.
ca4
Argued
May 6, 2026
Decided
Aug 18, 2026
Filed
May 6, 2025
Filed (CL)
May 6, 2025
CL Status
terminated

temporary restraining order preliminary injunction

Legal Issues

temporary restraining orderpreliminary injunction

The Law · How the Case Works

Overview

Overview

The government appealed Judge Chuang's order granting a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction which prevents ICE enforcement in houses of worship.

The Issue

Issue

Whether ICE enforcement activities conducted within houses of worship violate the First Amendment's protections for religious exercise and assembly, and whether such enforcement constitutes an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

The Rules

Rule

The First Amendment protects religious exercise and assembly; laws substantially burdening religious practice are subject to strict scrutiny unless they are generally applicable and neutral. The Fourth Amendment protects persons against unreasonable searches and seizures, and enforcement agents must employ the least restrictive means to accomplish legitimate government objectives.

The Application

Analysis

The lower court determined that ICE enforcement in houses of worship likely violates these constitutional protections, as such enforcement directly burdens religious assembly and exercise without adequate justification, and that less restrictive alternatives exist for immigration enforcement.

The Conclusion

On August 18, 2026, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the preliminary injunction in a published opinion by Senior Judge Barbara Milano Keenan, joined by Judges Agee and Harris, with Judge Agee concurring. The court held that the plaintiffs have standing because the predicted decline in worship attendance is fairly traceable to the new policy and redressable by an injunction, that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding the plaintiffs likely to succeed on their RFRA claim because the rescission substantially burdens their religious exercise, and that the government waived any strict-scrutiny defense by failing to present argument or evidence in the district court. The court did not reach the First Amendment claim. The preliminary injunction requiring DHS to follow its prior protected-areas guidance remains in effect.

CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
FiledMay 6, 2025
CL Statusterminated
View on CourtListener →
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
FiledMay 6, 2025
View on CourtListener →

No Supreme Court data for this case.

Federal Court TMR-ea197d12 ICE Enforcement in Houses of Worship <br> Appeal of 8:25-cv-00243 Aug 19, 2026
Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support