Wolford v. Lopez
Decision
6-3Legal Issues
BrynoDC Coverage 1 video
Opinion of the Court
Overview
Overview
This is a U.S. Supreme Court case about whether Hawaii's law presumptively banning carrying firearms on private property open to the public, unless the owner gives express consent, violates the Second Amendment under the standard set in Bruen. The case was argued before the Court on the same day, with oral arguments presented by both sides and questions from the justices. No decision or ruling has been issued yet, as the case is currently awaiting the Court's judgment.
The Facts
Facts
Following the Supreme Court's Bruen decision establishing a historical-tradition test for Second Amendment challenges, Hawaii enacted a law presumptively banning firearms on private property open to the public, restaurants, stores, and parks, unless the owner explicitly consents. Gun owners challenged the law as an unconstitutional restriction on the right to bear arms in public, creating a significant test of how broadly states may designate 'sensitive places.'
The Issue
Issue
Whether Hawaii's law presumptively banning firearms on private property open to the public, absent affirmative owner consent, comports with the Second Amendment's text, history, and tradition as articulated in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
The Rules
Rule
Under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), a firearms regulation is constitutional only if it is consistent with the Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation. The government bears the burden of identifying a historical analogue from the founding era. The Second Amendment presumptively protects the right to keep and bear commonly used arms in locations traditionally open to law-abiding citizens.
The Application
Analysis
Petitioners argue ordinary commercial spaces, restaurants, shops, parks, are not 'sensitive places' under Bruen's framework. Hawaii's default-prohibition scheme flips the constitutional presumption: licensed carriers should be able to carry everywhere unless specifically restricted. No founding-era tradition supports blanket bans on firearms in ordinary commercial establishments.
The Conclusion
Conclusion
[Awaiting opinion]
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support