← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

West Virginia v. B.P.J.

No. 24-43 SCOTUS · Decided SCOTUS
Cert Granted: Jul 3, 2025 Argued: Jan 13, 2026 Decided: Jun 30, 2026
📄 Read the Opinion
This decision was issued in conjunction with Little v. Hecox

Decision

Opinion Kavanaugh
Concurrence Thomas, J.
Concurrence Gorsuch, J.
Dissent Sotomayor, J. (joined by Kagan and Jackson, JJ.) (concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part)
Dissent Jackson, J. (concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part)

The Law · How the Case Works

Opinion of the Court

Kavanaugh

Overview

Overview

A case in which the Court will decide whether Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause allow a state to designate school sports teams for girls and boys based on students' biological sex as determined at birth.

The Facts

Facts

West Virginia enacted H.B. 3293, the Save Women's Sports Act, prohibiting transgender girls from competing on girls' sports teams in public schools. B.P.J., a transgender girl who has taken puberty blockers and estrogen since childhood, participated on a middle school girls' cross-country and track team and brought a Title IX and Equal Protection challenge. The Fourth Circuit ruled in her favor, and the case was consolidated with Little v. Hecox to resolve the circuit split.

The Issue

Issue

Whether West Virginia's Save Women's Sports Act, which excludes transgender girls from competing on girls' athletic teams in public schools, violates Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause as applied to a transgender girl who has undergone puberty suppression and hormone therapy from early childhood.

The Rules

Rule

Title IX's athletics regulations (34 C.F.R. § 106.41) permit single-sex sports teams where selection is based on competitive skill or contact sport safety considerations. The Equal Protection Clause's intermediate scrutiny standard requires sex-based distinctions to be substantially related to an important governmental interest. Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), held that Title VII's prohibition on sex discrimination encompasses gender identity.

The Application

Analysis

West Virginia argues its law classifies on biological sex. A legitimate basis for organizing athletics. Title IX expressly permits 'reasonable provisions considering the nature of particular sports.' The 1972 Congress understood 'sex' as biological sex, and Bostock's Title VII reasoning does not extend to Title IX's different regulatory structure and legislative history.

The Conclusion

Conclusion

Issued in conjunction with WV v BPJ. The states did not violate the constitution nor title IX.

The Record · 1 original document
Court -
FiledJul 16, 2024
CL Statusterminated
View on CourtListener →

No circuit court data for this case.

Cert GrantedJul 3, 2025
Statusterminated
Filed (CL)Jul 16, 2024
View on CourtListener →

Decision

Opinion Kavanaugh
Concurrence Thomas, J.
Concurrence Gorsuch, J.
Dissent Sotomayor, J. (joined by Kagan and Jackson, JJ.) (concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part)
Dissent Jackson, J. (concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part)
SCOTUS TMR-1c31d97e Jul 28, 2026
Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support