← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

United States v. Comey (seashell '86 47' post, E.D.N.C.)

No. 4:26-cr-00016 District · Active
Court
Federal (Criminal)
nced
Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Judge (CL)
Louise Wood Flanagan
Filed (CL)
Apr 28, 2026
CL Status
Active

The Story · What’s Happening

Case Overview

A federal criminal prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey in the Eastern District of North Carolina, before Judge Louise Wood Flanagan. His defense team includes Patrick J. Fitzgerald and former Deputy Solicitor General Michael R. Dreeben.

Update · Apr. 28, 2026

A grand jury indicted Comey, almost a year after the conduct at issue, on two counts arising from a single Instagram post: a photograph of seashells arranged to read "86 47". Count One charges a threat against the President under 18 U.S.C. Section 871(a), and Count Two charges transmitting a threatening communication in interstate commerce under 18 U.S.C. Section 875(c).

Update · Jul. 27, 2026

Comey moved to dismiss both counts, arguing the post is not a true threat and is protected political speech, noting that "86 47" was a widely sold and widely displayed anti-Trump slogan before his post and that "86" ordinarily means to get rid of or eject rather than to kill. He separately has motions pending to dismiss for selective prosecution and for vindictive prosecution. The government has not yet responded to the true-threat motion.

prosecutorial discretion Vindictive prosecution selective prosecution

Legal Issues

prosecutorial discretionVindictive prosecutionselective prosecution

The Law · How the Case Works

The Facts

Comey authored a series of memoranda after meetings with President Trump in early 2017, some of which he later shared with a personal friend who passed them to the press. Certain pages of those memos were subsequently classified. Federal prosecutors alleged that Comey retained and disclosed protected government records without authorization. Comey maintained that the memos were personal and that any classification was applied retroactively.

The Conclusion

Active prosecution as of the tracker coverage period. The case raises questions about retroactive classification, prosecutorial selectivity, and the line between personal notes and government records for senior officials. Status should be verified against current docket filings.

Court -
FiledApr 28, 2026
Judge Louise Wood Flanagan
CL StatusActive
View on CourtListener →

No circuit court data for this case.

No Supreme Court data for this case.

Federal Court Criminal TMR-46014ca2 Aug 29, 2026

Overview

A grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia indicted former FBI Director James Comey on two counts arising out of his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 30, 2020.

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support