Medina v. Planned Parenthood
BrynoDC Coverage 1 video
Overview
Overview
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Medina is the district court case from South Carolina that gave rise to the Supreme Court's decision in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (2025). South Carolina's governor directed the state Medicaid agency to exclude Planned Parenthood from the Medicaid provider network; Planned Parenthood and patient-plaintiffs sued in the District of South Carolina. The district court ruled for Planned Parenthood, finding the Medicaid Act's free-choice-of-provider provision privately enforceable. The case ultimately reached the Supreme Court, which reversed 6-3, holding there is no private right of action under Section 1983 to enforce the free-choice requirement.
The Facts
Facts
South Carolina issued an executive order directing the Department of Health and Human Services to exclude Planned Parenthood South Atlantic from its Medicaid network. Planned Parenthood filed suit as both a provider and on behalf of patient-plaintiffs, arguing the exclusion violated 42 U.S.C. Section 1396a(a)(23), which requires state Medicaid plans to allow beneficiaries to obtain services from any qualified provider. The district court issued a preliminary injunction. The Fourth Circuit affirmed. South Carolina sought SCOTUS review.
The Issue
Issue
Whether Medicaid beneficiaries may privately enforce the free-choice-of-provider requirement of the Medicaid Act under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. See Supreme Court resolution in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (2025): held 6-3 that no private right of action exists.
The Rules
Rule
42 U.S.C. Section 1396a(a)(23); Gonzaga University v. Doe (2002); 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. SCOTUS reversed the district court holding. No private enforcement right exists under the free-choice provision.
The Application
Analysis
Applying the Gonzaga standard for private rights of action under § 1983, the district court examined whether § 1396a(a)(23) created an individually enforceable right. The court found that the statute's clear language requiring states to permit beneficiaries to obtain services from any qualified provider established such a right, and accordingly issued a preliminary injunction in Planned Parenthood's favor; the Fourth Circuit affirmed. The Supreme Court reversed in 2025, holding that the free-choice provision, despite its mandatory terms, does not create a private right of action enforceable under § 1983.
The Conclusion
Conclusion
This is the district court origin case for what became Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic at SCOTUS. The Supreme Court's 6-3 reversal in 2025 controls.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support