← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Mullin v. Doe (consol. w/ Trump v. Miot) — TPS

No. 25-1083 SCOTUS · Decided SCOTUS
Cert Granted: Mar 16, 2026 Argued: Apr 29, 2026 Decided: Jun 25, 2026
📄 Read the Opinion

Temporary Protected Status (TPS)

Legal Issues

Temporary Protected Status (TPS)

The Law · How the Case Works

Overview

Overview

A case in which the Court will decide whether the Trump administration lawfully ended the Temporary Protected Status program for Syrian nationals.

The Facts

Facts

The Trump administration terminated Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations for Syrians (September 2025) and Haitians (November 2025), citing alleged improvements in country conditions and national interest. A federal district court blocked both terminations, finding the Secretary of Homeland Security lacked statutory authority and the decisions may have been racially motivated. The Supreme Court accepted the cases on certiorari before judgment to resolve the administration's authority.

The Issue

Issue

Whether the Secretary of Homeland Security has statutory authority to terminate Temporary Protected Status designations for entire countries based on improvements in country conditions, and whether courts may review such terminations under the Administrative Procedure Act.

The Rules

Rule

Under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a, the Secretary of Homeland Security designates countries for TPS when ongoing armed conflict, environmental disasters, or extraordinary conditions make it unsafe to return nationals. The Secretary may terminate a designation after notice and opportunity for comment. DHS v. Regents of the University of California, 591 U.S. 1 (2020), held that APA arbitrary-and-capricious review applies to TPS terminations; Ramos v. Wolf (9th Cir.) previously held some terminations inadequately reasoned.

The Application

Analysis

DHS argues it has authority to terminate immigration protections and enforce removal against individuals or classes protected by lower courts. The government's position is that executive enforcement discretion includes the power to rescind previously granted parole or protection, and that lower courts exceeded their authority in blocking these enforcement actions.

The Conclusion

Conclusion

Federal law bars judicial review of non-constitutional claims regarding Temporary Protected Status (TPS).

Court -
FiledMar 16, 2026
CL Statusactive
View on CourtListener →

No circuit court data for this case.

Cert GrantedMar 16, 2026
Statusactive
Filed (CL)Mar 16, 2026
View on CourtListener →
SCOTUS TMR-fd457d37 Jul 28, 2026

"You have a really large --you have a really broad definition of who's white and who's not white. As I said, I don't like dividing the people of the world into these groups."

Justice Alito, questioning counsel on whether Southern Italians are White

On June 28, republican Ohio Governor Mike Dewine asked the trump administration to reconsider. “It’s Haitians who, many times, are taking care of your mom or your dad who has Alzheimer’s, taking care of family members who might be in a nursing home,” the governor said. “And to say we’re going to pull all those [people] out, it’s just not in our own self-interest.”

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support