Los Angeles Press Club, et al. v. Noem, et al.
Overview
Overview
The Trump administration appealed Judge Vera's order granting a preliminary injunction which prevents federal agents from using crowd control weapons on members of the press and legal observers.
The Issue
Issue
Whether federal agents' use of crowd control weapons against members of the press and legal observers violates the First and Fourth Amendments, and whether a preliminary injunction barring such conduct was properly granted.
The Rules
Rule
The First Amendment protects press freedom and the right to observe government action. The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable seizure or use of force. A preliminary injunction requires showing likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, favorable balance of equities, and alignment with the public interest.
The Application
Analysis
The district court found federal agents used crowd control weapons against press members and legal observers during National Guard operations and granted a preliminary injunction preventing continued use. The appellants challenge whether the plaintiffs demonstrated the requisite likelihood of success and irreparable harm on constitutional grounds.
The Conclusion
Conclusion
The case is pending on appeal in the Ninth Circuit with the preliminary injunction currently in effect, preventing federal agents from using crowd control weapons on the press and legal observers pending appellate resolution.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support