← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Hensley v. Fieldtex Products, Inc. (2025 Legal Theory, SCOTU)

No. 6:25-cv-06799 District · Teaching/Historical
Court
Unclassified
nywd
Judge
Elizabeth A. Wolford 44
Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Judge (CL)
Elizabeth A. Wolford 44
Filed (CL)
Dec 19, 2025
CL Status
active

Case Overview

Hensley v. Fieldtex Products, Inc. (W.D.N.Y., No. 6:25-cv-06799, filed Dec. 19, 2025) is a putative consumer class action alleging that Fieldtex Products failed to safeguard customers' personally identifiable information and protected health information, which was exposed in an August 19, 2025 cyberattack on the company's network. NOTE: this appears to be a private data-breach class action, likely outside the tracker's federal-courts/accountability scope; flagged for scope review.

Fugitive tolling doctrine federal contractor immunity sovereign immunity supervised release tort

Legal Issues

Fugitive tolling doctrinefederal contractor immunitysovereign immunitysupervised releasetort

The Law · How the Case Works

The Issue

• Whether the Yearsley doctrine immunizes a federal contractor from state tort liability when acting under validly conferred federal authority • Whether the Boyle defense preempts state tort claims against contractors who comply with reasonably precise government specifications • Whether the contractor's actions fell within the scope of federal authorization sufficient to trigger immunity

The Rules

309 U.S. 18 (1940) Yearsley v. W.A. Ross Construction Co.

A contractor acting pursuant to validly conferred federal authority is immune from state tort liability, provided the government validly authorized and directed the work.

487 U.S. 500 (1988) Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.

Federal law displaces state tort law as to government contractors when the government approved reasonably precise specifications, the equipment conformed to those specifications, and the contractor warned the government of known dangers.

28 U.S.C. § 1442 Federal Officer Removal Statute

Any civil action commenced in state court against any person acting under a federal officer may be removed to federal district court.

Court -
FiledDec 19, 2025
Judge Elizabeth A. Wolford 44
CL Statusactive
View on CourtListener →

No circuit court data for this case.

No Supreme Court data for this case.

Unclassified TMR-0f837eb6 Aug 8, 2026

Cited By (2)

  • Lackey v. Stinnie SCOTUS

    This case concerns whether drivers can recover attorney's fees under federal civil rights law after prevailing in the…

  • Lackey v. Stinnie SCOTUS

    This case concerns whether drivers can recover attorney's fees under federal civil rights law after prevailing in the…

Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support