← All Cases Coverage by Bryan K. Randolph · BrynoDC

Harris County v. Environmental Protection Agency

No. 1:25-cv-03646 District · Active
Court
D.D.C.
dcd
Judge
Tanya S. Chutkan 44
Filed
Oct 13, 2025
Judge (CL)
Tanya S. Chutkan 44
Filed (CL)
Oct 13, 2025
CL Status
active


The Law · How the Case Works

Overview

Overview

Harris County, Texas sued the EPA over the termination of the Solar for All grants, despite Congress only rescinding unobligated balances in July 2025.

The Issue

Issue

Whether the EPA had statutory authority to terminate the Solar for All grant program when Congress only rescinded unobligated balances in July 2025, not the entire program.

The Rules

Rule

Federal agencies possess only the powers delegated by Congress and cannot obligate or expend funds beyond Congressional appropriation; agency termination of a program is limited to the scope of Congressional action rescinding those funds.

The Application

Analysis

Congress rescinded unobligated balances for the Solar for All program but did not defund or eliminate the program itself; the EPA nonetheless terminated the entire grant program, potentially exceeding the scope of the Congressional rescission.

The Conclusion

Conclusion

Active litigation in U.S. District Court for D.C. (Judge Tanya S. Chutkan) challenging whether the EPA's termination exceeded its statutory authority given the limited Congressional action.

Court -
FiledOct 13, 2025
Judge Tanya S. Chutkan 44
CL Statusactive
View on CourtListener →

No circuit court data for this case.

No Supreme Court data for this case.

Federal Court TMR-7b42fa64 Federal Grant Cancellation Jul 26, 2026
Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support