Harper v. Bessent (2025 Credit Union, DC)
Legal Issues
Overview
Overview
Todd Harper and Tanya Otska, two members of the National Credit Union Administration Board, sued the Trump administration over President Trump's attempt to terminate them from their positions on the board.
The Issue
Issue
Whether the President may unilaterally terminate members of the National Credit Union Administration Board without statutory cause or legal authorization.
The Rules
Rule
Federal officers with statutory removal protections may only be removed for cause as specified by statute; the President's removal power is limited when Congress has imposed tenure restrictions on executive officers.
The Application
Analysis
Harper and Otska contend the National Credit Union Administration Act restricts their removal to cause-based termination, and the Trump administration's attempt to fire them without legal process or statutory cause violates that protection.
The Conclusion
Conclusion
The court decided the case, determining whether NCUAB members have statutory removal protections that constrain the President's authority to terminate them.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support