Gordon v. Executive Office of the President
Overview
Overview
3 attorneys with the Department of Justice sued the Trump administration, challenging their terminations from the department.
The Issue
Issue
Whether the Trump administration's termination of three DOJ attorneys violated federal statutory protections for competitive service employees or constitutional rights against retaliation for protected speech.
The Rules
Rule
Federal employees in the competitive civil service may not be removed except for cause under 5 U.S.C. § 7511. Additionally, the government cannot remove employees in retaliation for protected First Amendment speech or whistleblowing activities. See Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968).
The Application
Analysis
The plaintiffs must establish either that they held competitive service positions lacking statutory cause for termination, or that their removals were motivated by constitutionally protected conduct such as speech or whistleblowing, rather than legitimate non-retaliatory reasons.
The Conclusion
Conclusion
The case remains active before Judge Jia M. Cobb in the D.C. District Court, with ultimate viability dependent on the plaintiffs' employment classifications and evidentiary showing of the administration's actual motivating factors.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support