Climate United Fund v. Citibank, N.A.
Case Overview
The government appealed Judge Chutkan's preliminary injunction which prevents the EPA from terminating the plaintiff's grants.
Legal Issues
The Application
Climate United Fund challenged the EPA's grant termination as exceeding statutory authority. Judge Chutkan issued a preliminary injunction finding sufficient likelihood of success that the EPA lacked unilateral authority to terminate grants under the funding freeze executive order.
The Conclusion
Sitting en banc, the D.C. Circuit resolved the government’s appeal in the dispute over the Environmental Protection Agency’s termination of grants awarded to the plaintiffs. On August 4, 2026, the court issued a per curiam judgment, without a memorandum opinion, vacating the portion of the district court’s preliminary injunction that had enjoined the EPA defendants from giving effect to the grant terminations, and it directed the clerk to issue the mandate and dissolve the administrative stay. On August 7, 2026, the en banc court granted the government’s unopposed motion to stay the mandate and extend the administrative stay pending the plaintiffs’ anticipated petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. Because the mandate remains stayed, the vacatur of that portion of the injunction does not take effect while Supreme Court review is sought.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support