Association of American Universities v. Department of Health & Human Services
Legal Issues
Overview
Overview
A coalition of state attorneys general sued the National Institute of Health, the acting NIH Director, HHS, and the acting HHS secretary over the Trump administration's new 14% cap on overhead for federal research grants, alleging that it violates the Administrative Procedures Act. This case was consolidated with similar cases brought by the Association of American Medical Colleges and Association of American Universities.
The Issue
Issue
Whether the Trump administration's 14% cap on overhead costs for federal research grants violates the Administrative Procedures Act by imposing a substantive rule without notice-and-comment rulemaking and/or constitutes arbitrary and capricious agency action.
The Rules
Rule
The APA requires federal agencies to follow notice-and-comment procedures before issuing substantive rules affecting parties' rights. Agency action is subject to judicial review and must not be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise contrary to law.
The Application
Analysis
The agencies imposed the overhead cap through executive action without formal rulemaking procedures, and plaintiffs argued the cap lacked rational factual support and improperly disregarded the agencies' existing authority to set indirect cost rates through negotiation and indirect cost agreements.
The Conclusion
Conclusion
The case was decided by Judge Angel Kelley in the Massachusetts District Court, resolving the consolidated challenge by the Association of American Universities, Association of American Medical Colleges, and state attorneys general to the research grant overhead restriction.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support