Association of American Medical Colleges v. National Institutes of Health (Res Grants MA Dist)
Legal Issues
Overview
Overview
A coalition of state attorneys general sued the National Institute of Health, the acting NIH Director, HHS, and the acting HHS secretary over the Trump administration's new 14% cap on overhead for federal research grants, alleging that it violates the Administrative Procedures Act. This case was consolidated with similar cases brought by the Association of American Medical Colleges and Association of American Universities.
Overview
The government appealed Judge Page Kelley's permanent injunction which prevents the government from implementing the research grant cap.
The Issue
Issue
Whether the Trump administration's 14% cap on overhead costs for federal research grants violates the Administrative Procedures Act.
The Rules
Rule
Under the APA, agency actions must follow proper notice-and-comment procedures or qualify as informal guidance, and are subject to judicial review for arbitrary and capricious action.
The Application
Analysis
The plaintiffs argue that the NIH's implementation of the 14% overhead cap either violated APA procedural requirements or constitutes arbitrary and capricious agency action that impairs academic research institutions' ability to conduct federally funded research.
The Conclusion
Conclusion
The case was decided by Judge Angel Kelley in Massachusetts District Court; the specific ruling outcome is not provided in the available summary.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support