← All Cases

New York v. McMahon (DOGE Access 2025)

No. 1:25-cv-01080 District · Active Active
Court
Federal Court
ncmd
Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Filed (CL)
Nov 26, 2025
CL Status
active

Case Overview

Twenty-one states sued to stop the Trump administration's elimination of roughly half the Department of Education's workforce through a mass reduction in force, a move that effectively transferred core statutory functions out of the agency without congressional authorization. The district court found the states were likely to succeed, calling the RIF likely unlawful, with no coherent basis for gutting a department Congress created by statute. The First Circuit refused to stay the injunction pending appeal, leaving the administration in the uncomfortable position of being legally required to maintain a department it has publicly committed to abolishing.


The Application

History

The administration eliminated half of DOE's workforce through mass RIF, effectively transferring statutory functions outside the agency. The district court found this action lacked coherent legal authority and violated the APA. The First Circuit refused to stay the injunction, leaving the administration legally bound to maintain the department.

The Conclusion

The district court found the states likely to succeed on the merits, determining the RIF is likely unlawful. The First Circuit's refusal to stay the injunction means the reduction in force remains enjoined pending appeal.

Federal Court TMR-7b4a7769 May 28, 2026
Subscribe on Substack ↗

This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support