Perkins Coie, LLP v. Department of Justice
Case Overview
Trump issued an executive order targeting Perkins Coie — stripping the firm's security clearances, barring its lawyers from federal buildings, and threatening its clients' government contracts — because the firm had represented Democrats and investigated Trump. A federal judge struck the order down as an unconstitutional attempt to punish lawyers for their clients. The case raised a question that cuts to the foundation of the legal system: can the government effectively destroy a law firm by making its clients radioactive, without ever charging anyone with anything?
The Conclusion
**Federal judge struck down the executive order as unconstitutional retaliation.** The court found that targeting Perkins Coie's security clearances, federal access, and clients' contracts based on the firm's representation of Democrats and investigation of Trump violated constitutional protections against punishment for legal advocacy. The decision reaffirmed that the government cannot destroy a law firm through collateral damage to its clients.
Flag an issue
This tracker is maintained by BrynoDC and is free because readers fund it. Support